<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financials &#8211; Suckerbet or Bottom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daxdesai.com/2008/01/24/financials-suckerbet-or-bottom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daxdesai.com/2008/01/24/financials-suckerbet-or-bottom/</link>
	<description>High Return Investing with Dax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:41:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Inquisitor</title>
		<link>http://www.daxdesai.com/2008/01/24/financials-suckerbet-or-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-</link>
		<dc:creator>Inquisitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daxdesai.com/2008/01/24/financials-suckerbet-or-bottom/#comment-</guid>
		<description>Nice move with AAPL... I&#039;ve held for a long time and done decently, could have made some money on the recent movement though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice move with AAPL&#8230; I&#8217;ve held for a long time and done decently, could have made some money on the recent movement though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dax Desai</title>
		<link>http://www.daxdesai.com/2008/01/24/financials-suckerbet-or-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-</link>
		<dc:creator>Dax Desai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daxdesai.com/2008/01/24/financials-suckerbet-or-bottom/#comment-</guid>
		<description>CGMFX looks like a nice fund.  

It has 2 things that I like:
1.  Expense ratio is very low.
2.  It has a heavy overseas exposure, notably in commodities

Foreign stocks should do better than domestic in 08 and metals should continue to be profitable trades.  I&#039;d say this is a winner and I&#039;m putting it on my short list for my wife&#039;s IRA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CGMFX looks like a nice fund.  </p>
<p>It has 2 things that I like:<br />
1.  Expense ratio is very low.<br />
2.  It has a heavy overseas exposure, notably in commodities</p>
<p>Foreign stocks should do better than domestic in 08 and metals should continue to be profitable trades.  I&#8217;d say this is a winner and I&#8217;m putting it on my short list for my wife&#8217;s IRA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StanHayes</title>
		<link>http://www.daxdesai.com/2008/01/24/financials-suckerbet-or-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-</link>
		<dc:creator>StanHayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daxdesai.com/2008/01/24/financials-suckerbet-or-bottom/#comment-</guid>
		<description>What do you think of cgmfx? Heard good things and was wondering your opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think of cgmfx? Heard good things and was wondering your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.254 seconds -->

